EOR Screening Dashboard

Systematic candidate selection for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Criteria from Taber, Martin & Seright (1983), NPC (1984), Green & Willhite (1998). Eight methods — CO₂ Miscible · N₂ · HC Miscible · WAG · Steam · In-Situ Combustion · Polymer · Surfactant/ASP — scored against eight reservoir parameters.

Filter:
Reservoir Parameters 8 parameters
Examples:

① Fluid Properties

8 – 55 °API
0.1 – 100,000 cp

② Reservoir Conditions

100 – 15,000 ft
50 – 350 °F

③ Rock Properties

5 – 50 %
0.5 – 10,000 md

④ Saturations

25 – 90 %
0 – 70 %
Screening Results
Click ▶ Run Screening to evaluate all EOR methods.

Fill in reservoir parameters on the left.
Load a quick example to get started.
Run screening to generate the score chart.
Screening ranges from Taber et al. (1983) SPE-12069 · NPC (1984) · Green & Willhite (1998) SPE Vol.6
Outer = acceptable range · Inner (italic) = ideal range
References
[1] Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D., Seright, R.S. (1983). EOR Screening Criteria Revisited. SPE-12069.
[2] National Petroleum Council (1984). Enhanced Oil Recovery. NPC Report, Washington D.C.
[3] Green, D.W., Willhite, G.P. (1998). Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE Textbook Series Vol. 6.
[4] Geffen, T.M. (1973). Oil Recovery Potential from Laboratory Surfactant Floods. JPT, 25(7).
[5] Stosur, G.J. et al. (2003). The Alphabet of EOR. SPE-84864.
← Back to rfourenergy.com © 2026 RFour Energy